Showing posts with label my performance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label my performance. Show all posts

Monday, July 5, 2010

Preferred Shares - Performance

As I explained in earlier posts, I had bought some preferred shares because they had gone down in price and was hoping to see a normalization of share prices before fear of inflation kicked in. It didn't really happen. Here's my investment performance on those preferred shares:

bns

bce

cl

pow

buy price

20.25

22.00

23.39

21.70

sell price

18.71

21.67

24.85

21.00

buy date

11-Aug-09

4-Nov-08

11-May-09

10-Aug-09

sell date

8-Apr-10

23-Apr-10

8-Apr-10

8-Apr-10

net gain/loss

-54.81

155.50

131.13

-4.84

return

-5.41

4.71

11.21

-0.45

annualized

-8.23

3.21

12.33

-0.68


net gain/loss includes dividends and 20$ in trading fees for each security.

The total return weighted by shares per security was 3.46%. Annualized that comes out to 2.36%. Over that period, XBB, a Canadian bond ETF gained about 4% and the TSE gained about 16% without counting dividends or interest, compared to my 3.46% including dividends. So, all in all, not very good for me.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

My Vanguard Performance - The Lost Decade

You might have heard of the lost decade. The cumulative total return for Vanguard's s&p 500 index fund for the last ten years (ending jan 31, 2010) is -8.48%, according to vanguard. (Appears to include reinvested dividends and management fees, see here). Hence the phrase the lost decade. My vanguard portfolio cumulative total return from Jan 1, 2000 to Jan 1, 2010 was 67%.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

My performance - securities

Here's my stock picking performance from march 2008 to Feb 19, 2010. I had some difficulty finding a tracking tool that takes dividends in to account. Apparently Google added dividend tracking to its portfolio tool, but, also apparently, it's pretty buggy.

These analyses are from my brokerage account tool. It takes dividends into account. I compare my performance to a global balanced benchmark. I erased the amounts of my investments, but the percentage change is there.



I beat the global balanced benchmark for all periods but 1 year. Since march 28, 2008, my performance is 8%, while the benchmark is -2.6%.

My benchmark is composed of a bunch of ETFs with dividends re-invested. Half of my initial benchmark investment was in a Canadian bond ETF (XBB), and the other half replicated the MSCI world index. These days you can invest in an MSCI world ETF, but not back in the old days of March 2008. So I looked at the composition of MSCI world, and replicated it with a Canadian ETF, a US ETF, and an EAFE ETF. (No emerging markets.)



You can see that the Canadian portion did really well. That's partly because the benchmark portfolio, as well as my portfolio, is in Canadian dollars. The Canadian dollar has appreciated against the US dollar and the Euro, so that's why Canada did well compared to the other regions. If you had a portfolio denominated in another currency, Canada would still have outperformed, but the other regions would have shown a better return than in a CDN$ portfolio.

My portfolio has 3 preferred shares (they have "PR" in the symbol). I haven't held them very long, but they are doing ok. They all trade below redemption value, so I think one could buy more. However, with interest rates going up the preferred shares might drop some more. Or, if people take higher interest rates as a sign of a recovery, the preferred share prices might go up instead. My three stock picks have done very well since I bought them. You can see my previous posts for discussions about these shares.



I also bought government real return bonds. These provide me with a global real return bond exposure. Some of these bonds were bought in mutual funds so I use equivalent ETFs in the portfolio to automate tracking. The Canadian real return ETF has done well, but the others have not, mainly because, as I mentioned above, the Canadian dollar appreciated against other currencies, reducing my returns from foreign bonds.



My three stock picks are hedged through a double inverse Canadian ETF (HXD). That's the big stinker in the portfolio. As an alternative to this ETF, I could have hedged with long-term index puts, or I could have used stop loss orders. The problem with stop loss orders though is that you can get whipsawed. You sell when the stock drops and lock in your loss, but you don't buy back until the stock goes back up. Classic opportunity loss. I still think that this is a cyclical bull in a secular bear market. Consequently, I'm going to hold on to my hedge at least until next January, or next market drop bigger than 10%.

I also bought a put on the SPDR KBW regional banking ETF (KRE) right before it shot up 20%. Ouch! Good thing I only bought a tiny amount.

Finally, I also bought two Australian bonds. One is a real return, with a real yield of 2.83%, maturing in 2015, and the other, also maturing in 2015, is a conventional bond yielding 5.35%. These will be hard to track because their market value is not automatically updated in the tracker. I'll also have to add interest payments by hand.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

My Vanguard performance

I have a 401K at Vanguard that I don't contribute to anymore. Consequently, any changes in account value result from investment performance. Here's my performance (for periods ending Dec 31st.).


these are the averages for world allocation funds for ytd, 1 yr, 3yr, 5yr, and 10 yr:



My performance turns out to be pretty good. I used morningstar to find world allocation funds with similar performance to mine. This provides an estimate of my rank among world allocation funds:

5 yr rank: top 31%.
3 yr rank: top 13%.
1 yr rank worse than 86%.

Now, if you understand the math behind these things, you'll realize that while I outperformed the average, I also did it with less risk.

Below you see the performance of the best world allocation fund that beat my performance over 5, 3, and, 1 years. You also see the average performance for the world allocation category.



Looking at the big dip, the Waddell & Reed fund went from 40K to 22K. A drop of 20%. It still hasn't fully recovered. The average performance for the category went from 17K to 11,272; a drop of 33.7%.

In contrast , my portfolio dropped from 30,250 to 25,212; that's only 17% (see below). At the end of 2009 my portfolio had fully recovered and stood at 33K. (On the whole, not as good as Waddell and Reed, though).


Much better performance than average, with a lot less risk. Pretty good, pretty good. I certainly earned my investment management fees.